On Wed, 26 Dec 2001, S.G. Sudhakar wrote: > Hi, > I am facing a problem in reports generated by Analog. I was supposed to > compare the reports generated by the new Analog (Analog-5.03) with the > old version (Analog-4.0). To my surprice the reports generated by these > 2 versions are not the same :-( > The problem is that for some dates both the reports are same but for > some dates it's not! > > So I compared the cache file sizes. It's also looking the same or more > or less the same for the one which gives the correct result, but it's > different for the one which are not correct. What I mean here is that > the cache file sizes are different for some dates. Then later I started > running the OLD Analog once again to generate the cache file for one > which is different. I found that the size various from the original. I > don't know why it's like that? Is it due to the different version of > Analog or due to some miss manupulation on data. >
update.html in the docs lists intentional differences between different versions. If that doesn't explain whatever differences you are seeing, you will have to tell us exactly what the differences are, preferably with a simple test case. -- Stephen Turner, Cambridge, UK http://homepage.ntlworld.com/adelie/stephen/ "This is Henman's 8th Wimbledon, and he's only lost 7 matches." BBC, 2/Jul/01 +------------------------------------------------------------------------ | This is the analog-help mailing list. To unsubscribe from this | mailing list, go to | http://lists.isite.net/listgate/analog-help/unsubscribe.html | | List archives are available at | http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ | http://lists.isite.net/listgate/analog-help/archives/ | http://www.tallylist.com/archives/index.cfm/mlist.7 +------------------------------------------------------------------------
