On Wednesday, January 12, 2005 6:36 PM [GMT], Nick Altmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> If lines 2 and 3 aren't indented, there would be no way to >> recognize that they are subsets. > > Thanks for the reply. For my particular purpose, I'm more interested > in the absolute order of referring pages than in any grouping of > them. I'd also like to leave out (in my example) lines like > "http://www.google.com/search" which themselves don't refer any > requests. http://www.google.com/search is the referring page. Is there any difference between a "foo" reference from Yahoo and a "foo" reference from google? It sounds like you should probably be looking at the Search report, rather than the referrer report. I don't know whether you can use aliases to modify the way referrers are parsed. Has anyone any experience with that? Aengus +------------------------------------------------------------------------ | TO UNSUBSCRIBE from this list: | http://lists.meer.net/mailman/listinfo/analog-help | | Usenet version: news://news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.analog.general | List archives: http://www.analog.cx/docs/mailing.html#listarchives +------------------------------------------------------------------------