Chris, Blimey. Maybe M$ will make the Windows versions for Vista and Server 2008 different in the end, in the same way XP is 5.1 and Windows Server 2003 is 5.2, because the products share a similar relationship. Who knows, it would seem a sensible option, though there's little definite evidence as yet...
The data you've included looks like downloads of the updated Analog from your site. As you'll see I didn't download using Vista x64, but am running it on such as I said. I downloaded using a 32-bit OS on a processor using the AMD64 architecture and you're correct there is no record of this. However, I wonder what would happen if I were to download again using a 64-bit OS? Since you might post details of my IP and software environment I'm a little nervous about doing so, despite my connection being proxied anyhow. As I say I have seen other log analysers record the difference between x86 and x64 operating systems and I'd be surprised if Analog can't. That would be a reason to switch if you're right! Really this is for academic interest though, but with the move to 64-bit computing on the Windows platform over the next few years it would seem a good feature to have. As for Safari it's easy enough for me to scan down the Browser Report looking for instances of Safari and noting those on the Windows platform instead of Mac OS. Paul +------------------------------------------------------------------------ | TO UNSUBSCRIBE from this list: | http://lists.meer.net/mailman/listinfo/analog-help | | Analog Documentation: http://analog.cx/docs/Readme.html | List archives: http://www.analog.cx/docs/mailing.html#listarchives | Usenet version: news://news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.analog.general +------------------------------------------------------------------------
