So the pageview definition, one of our core organisational KPIs, is owned simultaneously by everyone?
On 3 December 2015 at 12:54, Nuria Ruiz <nu...@wikimedia.org> wrote: >>Who does own it? > On our opinion every team should own the definition of a pageview in their > product right and when in doubt analytics or research can be involved to > provide feedback on lessons learned. > > For example: who is best qualified than IOS team to decide what constitutes > a page in the IOS app? > > With that in mind I have created a ticket to define what constitutes a > Search pageview: https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T120249 > > Let me know what is a good discovery project to tag this ticket with so this > ticket gets some visibility. > > Thanks, > > Nuria > > > > On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 9:44 AM, Oliver Keyes <oke...@wikimedia.org> wrote: >> >> On 2 December 2015 at 15:38, Nuria Ruiz <nu...@wikimedia.org> wrote: >> >>It's true that MediaWiki supports search based solely on the ?search >> >> query >> >> parameter. Regardless of whether title=Special:Search is specified. >> >>This is mostly for legacy reasons as search predates the concept of >> >> special >> >> pages. >> >>However, would it make sense to instead count these as page views for >> >> 'Special:Search'? >> > >> > One thing worth clarifying is that analytics team doesn't own the >> > pageview >> > definition (https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Page_view), we >> > implement it to the best of our ability. Deciding what constitutes a >> > pageview for search falls on the search team as they are the ones that >> > know >> > their functionality best (substitute "search team" by "some entity with >> > knowledge of mediawiki's search abilities") According to Timo's comment >> > it >> > seems that "?search" requests should be counted as true pageviews but >> > let us >> > know otherwise via phab ticket or this list. >> > >> >> Who does own it? >> >> > Thanks, >> > >> > Nuria >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 11:57 AM, Federico Leva (Nemo) >> > <nemow...@gmail.com> >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> Oliver Keyes, 02/12/2015 18:52: >> >>> >> >>> Via Brian Davis we find out the responsible patch is >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> https://github.com/wikimedia/analytics-refinery-source/commit/05e5da92553dbd3e691eb45d40e559895337935f >> >> >> >> >> >> Context: >> >> >> >> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research_talk:Page_view/Archive_1#Parameters_appended_to_short_URLs >> >> >> >> Nemo >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> Analytics mailing list >> >> Analytics@lists.wikimedia.org >> >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics >> > >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Analytics mailing list >> > Analytics@lists.wikimedia.org >> > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> Oliver Keyes >> Count Logula >> Wikimedia Foundation >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Analytics mailing list >> Analytics@lists.wikimedia.org >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics > > > > _______________________________________________ > Analytics mailing list > Analytics@lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics > -- Oliver Keyes Count Logula Wikimedia Foundation _______________________________________________ Analytics mailing list Analytics@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics