On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 9:15 AM, Indicator Veritatis <mej1...@yahoo.com>wrote:
> The way you reach your conclusion from your premises is so illogical, > you are casting doubt on your own ability to think logically enough to > be a competent programmer. > > The real reason Dianne has "quite a following" is because she really > does know Android extremely well, having been at the center of > everything Android since very near its beginning. And she has > dispensed a great deal of valuable Android knowledge in this forum > over the years, too, even if some of her responses were so brief they > read like Delphic utterances:( > > And not surprisingly, Dianne is 100% correct on this one: hard coding > package names is bound to break the code, whether now or in the > future. If it really is, as you say, a "hard requirement" then you are > going to have to resign yourself to having broken code. You have been > warned, don't shoot the messenger. Go back to your client and explain > the consequences of this "hard requirement". You just might find it is > not such a "hard requirement" after all. > I don't know how many times I have to say but the client has complete control of the environment. Why is this so difficult to understand? Shane -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
