On Apr 27, 6:44 pm, Dianne Hackborn <[email protected]> wrote: > Also it may be worth mentioning -- there was a significant change to the > activity lifecycle in 3.0 where onStop() is now guaranteed to be killed > (prior to killing a process) like onPause() has always been.
I am glad this change was made, it makes more logical sense to me to do it this way. Hopefully the documentation can also be updated to remove any doubt whatsoever that an Activity cannot possibly be 'removed' from memory in low-memory situations (when the process is _not_ killed), that would result in an inconsistent or leak state by not having balanced lifecycle methods called. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
