Thanks for the response...
I've just saw it today...
this is my class declaration public class AsyncRequest<T> extends
AsyncTask<Object, Void, AsyncResponse<T>> {
using getTypeParameters
TypeVariable<?>[] types = getClass().getTypeParameters();
types[0].getBounds()[0] is a class java.lang.Object
The only way I got it working is when instantiating my class
AsyncRequest<ResponseDTO> asyncRequest = new
AsyncRequest<ResponseDTO>(mContext, asyncResponseListener){};
Using an empty anonymous inner class
Lúcio Maciel
luci...@gmail.com
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 03:13, Nikolay Elenkov
<nikolay.elen...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 9:31 AM, luciofm <luci...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> In this case, with getSuperclassTypeParameter() I get the parameterized
>> types of AsyncTask, and not of my own Class AsyncRequest...
>> (parameterized.getActualTypeArguments()[0] is a String type).
>>
>
> That's the way getGenericSuperclass() is supposed to work. Use
> getTypeParameters() to get the generic variables of the current class.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Android Developers" group.
> To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Android Developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
