Hi maybe you can refer Browser component
/package/apps/Browser/asserts/plugins/gear.so and BrowserActivity.java head of function run() On Dec 17, 10:07 am, "Dianne Hackborn" <hack...@android.com> wrote: > We deliberately do not do this, so we can always reset the application back > to the initial state it was installed in. Keeping .apks entirely > self-contained, self-sufficient, and without needing some external installer > that you can loose is of tremendous value in being able to manage everything > the user has installed and simplifying their experience. > > This is something that I will very strongly push back from changing, and is > central to just about everything about how we manage applications, such as > the fact that applications don't go and explicitly register themselves with > part of the system, but rather declare those things in the manifest. > > > > On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 3:18 PM, Urs Grob <grob....@gmail.com> wrote: > > > It would be nice to have something like an installation package that > > contains the apk as well as some files that are only needed during > > installation time. Like this you could deploy e.g. your sqlite db file > > with some initial content or some files that maybe should be stored > > inflated on the sdcard. > > > -- Urs > > > On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 11:33 PM, jarkman <jark...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Thanks for the confirmation. Still seems like a shame... :-) > > > > R. > > > > On Dec 16, 5:25 pm, "Dianne Hackborn" <hack...@android.com> wrote: > > >> The .apk is read-only, and can not be modified. > > > >> On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 12:49 AM, jarkman <jark...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> > We've got a similar issue, with a bunch of files that we extract from > > >> > the apk on first run and will never need in the apk again. > > > >> > It is a terrible waste of space to leave them there. Shame. > > > >> > Richard > > > >> > On Dec 15, 9:16 pm, Ralf <ralfo...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> > > You can think of the the APK as being a read-only zip file, so I > > don't > > >> > > think you can remove anything from it. You don't really need to > > remove > > >> > > your lib from the apk anyway, do you? > > > >> > > R/ > > > >> > > On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 5:50 AM, shuoshuo <wzshuos...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > >> > > > I have made an application, it uses a C++ shared library, I want > > >> > > > deploy it by including it with the .apk package, at run time, copy > > it > > >> > > > from the assets to a file, then remove it from assets in apk, how > > >> > > > could I remove a file from assets in apk at runtime? or Is there > > any > > >> > > > other alternative to deploy a C++ shared library? > > > >> -- > > >> Dianne Hackborn > > >> Android framework engineer > > >> hack...@android.com > > > >> Note: please don't send private questions to me, as I don't have time to > > >> provide private support. All such questions should be posted on public > > >> forums, where I and others can see and answer them. > > -- > Dianne Hackborn > Android framework engineer > hack...@android.com > > Note: please don't send private questions to me, as I don't have time to > provide private support. All such questions should be posted on public > forums, where I and others can see and answer them. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
