>
> That hasn't stopped many devices from making the removable storage their 
> primary one. But if this is by design, I'd like to link to the design 
> philosophy document. Maybe I can send that to the users. I can't find 
> anything official, though. If the other devices are going to be unwriteable 
> 90% of the time, I can't spend much more time on it. 
>

I find it hard to believe that devices exist that treat removable storage 
as primary.

If your app/users need to create very large files, you need devices with 
>> huge amounts of internal storage or you need to work out an alternate 
>> mechanism such as cloud storage. Handheld portable devices are not general 
>> purpose computers (yet). You should not expect to use them as one.
>>
>
> I do no subscribe to that philosophy. Compared to computers of not very 
> many years ago, 2Gig or 8gig is already lots of space. If there is another 
> card slot, users are going to put a 32gig SD card. In practice, it is not 
> removed all that often. It is only natural that users expect apps to be 
> able to use that space. Then they find out some can and some can't. 
>

At the same rate, the storage demand of a typical user has gone up. Today 
we have a need to store gigabytes of media files (music, pictures and 
videos) which did not exist many years ago so 8 gigs is not a "lot of 
space" anymore. Did we have 8 megapixel cameras in devices or ability to 
view HD videos a few years ago?

I agree that it would be great to have ability to discover the removable 
storage in a sane and predictable manner but as I said, it looks like the 
platform wants to treat the removable storage as a transient readonly 
storage for media files.
 

> I understand by now that I don't have any say, but this idea of tight, 
> arbitrary control of what content a user puts on their own storage volume 
> seems more Apple like than Android like. Apple users don't, in general, 
> have file access to their own volume, so Android *could* be very 
> competitive in this area. But at present, we are frustrating users enough 
> that they are crawling back to iOS. 
>

Funny you mention iOS in this context when you don't even have *any* 
removable storage in devices running iOS. So what is the reason the users 
are "crawling" back to iOS? What is it buying them?

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Android Developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en

Reply via email to