On Tuesday, April 17, 2012 4:19:19 PM UTC-7, Dianne Hackborn wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 3:09 PM, Nathan wrote:
>
>> On Monday, April 16, 2012 7:07:33 PM UTC-7, Dianne Hackborn wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 8:56 AM, digi owl  wrote:
>>>
>>>> looking at the 3.2 platform API changes, it appears that Google wants 
>>>> developers to access SD cards via either MeidaStore or the MTP API:
>>>> https://developer.android.com/**sdk/android-3.2.html<https://developer.android.com/sdk/android-3.2.html>
>>>>
>>>> https://developer.android.com/**reference/android/mtp/package-**
>>>> summary.html<https://developer.android.com/reference/android/mtp/package-summary.html>
>>>>
>>>> https://developer.android.com/**reference/android/provider/**
>>>> MediaStore.html<https://developer.android.com/reference/android/provider/MediaStore.html>
>>>
>>>
>>> I don't know I'd include MTP in this, but yes for apps MediaStore allows 
>>> you to query across whatever storage is being aggregated by the device. 
>>>  Note that for everything except the primary external storage partition, 
>>> you should expect to only have write access to the files.
>>>
>>> Did you mean to say that we should assume only *read access* to the 
>> files? Is that because of some platform guidance, because of the 
>> manufacturers' philosophy, or neither, just the way it is?
>>
>
> Gah, very sorry, yes I meant READ access.
>

And is the READ access due to a decision by the manufacturer, or is it the 
Android standard as of 3.2? I just need to know what to tell my customers. 

Nathan
 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Android Developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en

Reply via email to