The only thing different, as far as I can tell, between my approach, and the sample's is that the client and service are in the same project and share the same manifest, and in my service's manifest I don't use something like:
<action android:name="com.example.android.apis.app.REMOTE_SERVICE" /> So, in the sample, the clients use this 'name' for the service to start/bind to it. I use the class name as is used in other service examples. I wonder if, because the service is remote, it makes a difference using a specified name... Hans --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
