I don't understand what are you really asking? Whether arrays are faster than collection classes? Yes, they are faster, but you have to manage their contents (insertions, deletions, etc.) yourself.
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 3:31 PM, Josh Dobbs <[email protected]> wrote: > Here's what my code looks like... > > > private > > Collection _cars; > > Car myCar= > > new Car(1,1,false,5, "blue"); > > Car myCar2= new Car(1,1,false,5, "red"); > > _cars.add(myCar); > _cars.add(myCar2); > > > On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 6:18 AM, Josh Dobbs <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >You mean like the ones in the java.util >> Yes, specifically java.util.collection >> >What's a VO? >> A VO is basically a class that only contains properties(Value Objects). >> >> >> On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 4:53 AM, Mark Murphy <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> >>> Josh wrote: >>> > I want to store objects into an array or collection(whichever is best >>> > suited to this in dalvik). >>> >>> You mean like the ones in the java.util package? >>> >>> > the objects are basically just VO's all of >>> > the same class that i want to keep track of. >>> >>> What's a VO? >>> >>> -- >>> Mark Murphy (a Commons Guy) >>> http://commonsware.com >>> _The Busy Coder's Guide to Android Development_ Version 2.0 Available! >>> >>> > > > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
