Solved ... the culprit was trying to run without the window background
via : 
http://android-developers.blogspot.com/2009/03/window-backgrounds-ui-speed.html

It seems that this theme speed may speed up my surfaceView but screws
up my lists.

This cost me a lot of frustration to sort out.  I hope this helps someone else!

Jason Van Anden
http://www.smileproject.com

On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 7:30 AM, Jason Van Anden
<jason.van.an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Not to beat a dead horse ... but other suggestions regarding how to
> deal with the mis-registered list view issue would be super
> appreciated.  My app is a data visualization app like Google Maps and
> I was using the SurfaceView mainly in order to better control the draw
> loop (like what is described in the blog entry).
>
> Thanks,
> Jason Van Anden
> http://www.smileproject.com
>
>
>
>
> On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 6:49 AM, Jason Van Anden
> <jason.van.an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> This looks like it does what I have been trying to do ... except that I have
>> no way of knowing if it will resolve the problem that occurs when I call the
>> listview until I tinker with it.  I have things running "well enough" except
>> for this problem (thus I am inclined to continue with what I have and wait
>> to use 1.5 until it is ready for release).  The mis-registration of the
>> buffers is super weird ... esp since it only occurs when started from the
>> activity with the surfaceview.
>>
>> Thank you,
>> Jason
>>
>> On Apr 25, 2009 3:28 PM, "Mike Hearn" <mh.in.engl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Does GLSurfaceView do what you want? See the latest blog post.
>>
>> >>
>>
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Android Developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
android-developers-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to