On 1 mai, 14:27, Mark Murphy <mmur...@commonsware.com> wrote: > remy berrebi wrote: > > it's very sad. > > i still not understand the fact that android is so "close" about system > > setting. if we can not interact with system by ourself, the possibility > > to make very interesting apk is very low :-( > > > let's all make RSS reader and clock widget and nothing more :-( > > There are "RSS reader and clock widget" applications on the market for > Android, but it is a very low percentage. Other developers seem to be > able to think of applications, beyond those, that can be written. >
sorry, i was a little upset and furious about not having the possibility to make what i want to do :-( i know many interesting apps are available, but when you touch on some part of the system, like sync setting you can't do nothing :-( the permission signatureOrSystem should also let user able to sign their apps with android root certificate for example, or something, to let dev guy able to do think about setting... and once again, disclaimer are there to warm user about what application try to do... > > i think i will make my application for Root device only, as i read on > > root you have no restriction anymore. > > No, the "restriction" will still be there. However, you can write your > own firmware to change whatever you want. > really? > > but if google want to be so "open mind" they really need to improve > > access and permission on android (even old version like 1.6), and not > > remove them one after another :-( > > I do not recall "content://sync/settings" ever being part of the SDK. > Would you care to demonstrate that this *was* part of the SDK and > therefore something developers should be using? > > If developers were not supposed to be using it in the first place, > please do not complain about it being "removed". > > http://www.androidguys.com/2009/12/14/code-pollution-reaching-past-th... > sorry, i'm not able to show you, but i found some explanation about accessing and changing setting available on sdk 1.1 but didn't find the page any more :-( but my main gaol is that : even if it's not implemented, we should be able to improve the system with dev request. > -- > Mark Murphy (a Commons > Guy)http://commonsware.com|http://github.com/commonsguyhttp://commonsware.com/blog|http://twitter.com/commonsguy > > Warescription: Three Android Books, Plus Updates, One Low Price! > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Android Developers" group. > To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group > athttp://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
