They're tagged 'head', not the actual released code. (Still a lesser problem, but a problem..)
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 9:31 AM, Mark Murphy <[email protected]> wrote: > Disconnect wrote: > > So absolutely nothing was changed on any of those for 2.1 and/or the N1? > > That is somewhat hard to believe. (Possible, but it seems unlikely, > > excepting dbus perhaps.) > > Bear in mind that 2.1 is Eclair, just as 2.0 and 2.0.1 were. > > > The good news is, if thats true it is a simple > > matter for someone (JBQ?) to create the necessary tags. (A lesser > > violation than no code at all, but still an issue -- the ACTUAL sources > > need to be available, not "its in there somewhere, good luck".) > > > > http://android.git.kernel.org/?p=platform/external/dbus.git;a=summary - > > no tags for 2.0, no changes since "2009-11-15 Jean-Baptiste... > > merge from eclair" > > > http://android.git.kernel.org/?p=platform/external/wpa_supplicant.git;a=summary > > - same > > > http://android.git.kernel.org/?p=platform/external/bluetooth/bluez.git;a=summary > > - "eclair snapshot" > > Given that 2.1 is Eclair, these seem to be appropriately tagged. > > -- > Mark Murphy (a Commons Guy) > http://commonsware.com | http://twitter.com/commonsguy > > Android Consulting/App Development: http://commonsware.com/consulting > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Android Discuss" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<android-discuss%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/android-discuss?hl=en. > > > >--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Discuss" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected].
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-discuss?hl=en.
