Yes, I agree with that. My question is if we generalize it (and we can't really just remove it from Camera because it's part of the public API), where should it go in the framework?
I have my own ideas, but I'd like to hear other opinions. On Jan 21, 5:45 pm, hanchao3c <[email protected]> wrote: > It seems the Camera/ExifInterface.java is only one usage of externel/ > jhead. > > On Jan 21, 9:42 pm, Formosalf <[email protected]> wrote: > > > There is no Java API for EXIF in current framework. It is inside Camera apk. > > Its native library already exists in externel/jhead, will it be better that > > we move Camera/ExifInterface.java to Android framework? Not inside Camera > > apk? --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "android-framework" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-framework?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
