No decision has been made about where to put the EXIF libraries. I'm not sure what version of EXIF spec is supported - the code is available in the open source tree if you want to have a look. We do support geo-tags and this is enabled in the camera application.
On Mar 11, 8:58 am, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Dave, > > Have we decided on this? Another quesion, which EXIF version does > Android support? do we support EXIF with location info? > > Thanks, > Yong > > On Jan 22, 7:09 pm, Dave Sparks <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Yes, I agree with that. My question is if we generalize it (and we > > can't really just remove it from Camera because it's part of the > > public API), where should it go in the framework? > > > I have my own ideas, but I'd like to hear other opinions. > > > On Jan 21, 5:45 pm, hanchao3c <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > It seems the Camera/ExifInterface.java is only one usage of externel/ > > > jhead. > > > > On Jan 21, 9:42 pm, Formosalf <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > There is no Java API forEXIFin current framework. It is inside Camera > > > > apk. > > > > Its native library already exists in externel/jhead, will it be better > > > > that > > > > we move Camera/ExifInterface.java to Android framework? Not inside > > > > Camera > > > > apk?- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "android-framework" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-framework?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
