Per 3GPP spec 27.005, there is a way to set the sms transport, such as
over cirucuit switch (CS) as of today or over packet switch (PS) or a
using a preference list. The AT command for that is AT+CGSMS.

>From the Android framework pespective, seems it is not necessary to
have the sms applications aware of the transport being used. We have
done this kind of support under HAL layer just using AT+CGSMS for the
transport selection.

thanks,
Gordon

On May 31, 6:02 am, Seer <[email protected]> wrote:
> Since i am getting no replies at all maybe i am on the wrong mailing
> list.  What is the correct mailing list for this sort of thing? I
> thought the framework would be the API's etc so this would belong here
> but maybe i am wrong and it is platform or something? I really need
> this functionality and i know others want it as well. I would really
> like some feedback and tips on how and what i need to do to try to get
> this functionality added to Android.  Can anyone help me at all?
>
> Regards,
>
> Chris
>
> On May 29, 7:27 am, Seer <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Guys
> > What do you all think of a way to process outgoingsmsthat is
> > implemented the same way as it is for calls?
>
> > I am talking about the PROCESS_OUTGOING_CALLS permission and the
> > broadcast that goes with it that allows you to monitor, modify, or
> > abort outgoing calls.
>
> > Now that it is generally cheaper to sendsmsand the like over the
> > internet or maybe you want to blocksmsfrom going to some numbers.
> > Currently there is no way to do that apart from writing your ownsms
> > application which is hardly the proper solution.  There are so many
> > greatsmsclients out there and apps that sendsmson their own and
> > someone wanting to write an app that redirectssms'sover the internet
> > for example should not need to rewrite them all.
>
> > I know this has been raised before on different mailing lists etc but
> > i don't think it has been raised here on the framework one where i
> > think it belongs. Is there a reason why this functionality is not part
> > of the framework? I know there are others that would really like to
> > see this functionality added.  I hope there are some people on here
> > that may give some feedback on the idea and maybe give hints on ways
> > to help increase the chances of it been in a future version of
> > androids framework.
>
> > Regards,
>
> > Chris
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"android-framework" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/android-framework?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to