Hi Dan, Are the library and DVM sources available for the OHA members? If a company wants to make processors for the mobile handsets, do they get the library and DVM sources if that company joins the OHA now?
Thanks, KT On Mar 27, 5:28 pm, "Dan Morrill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Two of your own citations contradict your statements. (HTC never said and > did not confirm the rumors surrounding their devices, and the date of > second-half 2008 is indeed unchanged, as the articles state.) As you claim > to be an industry veteran, I would think you'd know better than to follow > rumors so closely. > > The most accurate information we have is still second half of 2008. It's > your right to choose to believe that's a public relations statement and not > based (as it actually is) on our and our partners' schedules. That does > not, however, give your opinion any credibility. > > Feel free to disbelieve me if you like, but I suspect that you are really > just engaged in FUD. > > - Dan > > 2008/3/27 Stone Mirror <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > Dan: > > > Samsung said at MWC that they won't have an Android phone before next > > year:http://www.reuters.com/article/technologyNews/idUSL1169121920080211. > > This has been widely reported, it's not my opinion. Similarly, HTC says > > their Android phone will be out "near the end of the year": see > >http://www.infoworld.com/article/08/03/20/HTC-names-Google-phone-Drea.... > > Could be either side of "the end of the year" and still be "near" to it. > > > Now, I did state that "based on the completeness of the SDK" (which is > > clearly a judgment I'm making) I think it's unlikely. I've had substantial > > experience shipping commercial operating systems, something I'd point out > > that Google *doesn't *have. > > > Let's be frank, Dan: the state of Android, looking at the SDK, is *far *from > > "feature complete", which puts in, in any standard software development > > terms, at pre-alpha. It's unstable, performance is sketchy (and seems to > > have worsened in the second SDK drop). It's got a long way to go before it's > > ready for prime time. So, yes, I'm stating an opinion, but it's an informed > > and educated one. > > > Google's own lawyer, Richard Whitt, made the apparent misstatement that > > Android phones might be out "this summer or fall", and was immediately > > corrected: seehttp://www.news.com/8301-13579_3-9901954-37.html. So yes, > > the party line is "second half of 2008", but it won't be summer, and it > > won't be fall, apparently, which takes us pretty much up to the end of the > > year. > > > So, what part of what I said is "untrue"? Do you want to provide a tighter > > clarification of what you mean? If not, I'll stand by my statements. > > > -- > > 鏡石 --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Internals" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-internals?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
