On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 8:21 AM, Raj Kumar <rajkumar...@gmail.com> wrote: > Ok. thats great. because i was thinking if we have proprietary driver whose > some parts are under GPL and some parts under proprietary license,
Wait right there. You can not have such a thing, that violates the GPL, so it is impossible, sorry. > then it means GPL does not enforce any coding standards so then proprietary > license company can define its code style for its driver code but not > strictly as defined in /kernelsource/Documentation/CodeStyle. I think the coding style issues are the least of your worries here. Best of luck with the lawyers getting this all straightened out, you need to be working with them right now to get this resolved. greg k-h -- unsubscribe: android-kernel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com website: http://groups.google.com/group/android-kernel
