It's sad to see the response on those issues. Would some one from google to give some comments here? How would the effort in making android x86 be more efficient and appreciated by Google? Thus it can be beneficial to all the people interested to run Android on x86. Thanks. -- Chen
2009/5/11 Chih-Wei <cwhu...@linux.org.tw>: > > Hi Yang, > Actually we have tried. Yi and I have submitted some patches > (9494, 9496, 9497, 9749, 9779, 9782, ...) > but all of them are rejected, or just ignored. > I also tried to contact Dima Zavin, the original author of eee_701. > No response at all. > That makes me a little disappointed. > > Though I'm still new to android, > I think is *not* as open as it declared to be. > That's all the feeling I can say up to now. > > On 5月11日, 下午12時00分, Chen Yang <sunsety...@gmail.com> wrote: >> How about submitting one or two patches to the specific project for >> comments? Then we may have some base for the follow up. And once familar >> with the process and considerations behind, we may update the patches and >> hopefully to get them accepted by google. my 2 cents. > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ unsubscribe: android-porting+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com website: http://groups.google.com/group/android-porting -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
