I really don't understand.  How is your native code running at all if you
haven't loaded the library?

On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 1:07 PM, HV <harishv.athr...@gmail.com> wrote:

> The desktop icon is for the simple java app (JNIDemo.apk). I guess what I
> need is a way of calling a Java method from a native library without having
> to do a load library from the Java app. Is that possible?
>
> If I load the library from JNIdemo, then there will be 2 contexts of the
> library, one from JNIDemo and the other from where I actually need to
> launch DragonHunter, so that wont work for my requirement
>
>
> On Tuesday, July 17, 2012 11:55:01 PM UTC-7, Dianne Hackborn wrote:
>>
>> What is "DesktopIcon"?  I don't understand what you are describing.
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 2:46 PM, HV <harishv.athr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Ok, I got this working. A simple JAVA app (say JNIDemo) that calls a
>>> native method (in say NativeLib.so), which in turn calls back a JNIDemo
>>> method. All of this is working seamlessly. Now, the next problem I have is
>>> context related. I have a desktop icon which is supposed to launch an
>>> Android app (such as DragonHunter) and that is failing:
>>>
>>> 1. JNIDemo -> NativeLib -> JNIDemo (works fine)
>>> 2. DesktopIcon -> NativeLib -> JNIDemo (fails to launch an app such as
>>> DragonHunter)
>>>
>>> Now, since 1 & 2 are running in separate processes, the JNI variables
>>> are no longer valid in #2. Any ideas?
>>>
>>> On Saturday, July 7, 2012 11:40:05 PM UTC-7, HV wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Thanks Dianne, that's what I thought, hence this question. Glad to know
>>>> that using 'am' is not the way to go. Could you please provide a link to
>>>> the SDK where it talks about this? If there is an example, that'll be
>>>> awesome
>>>>
>>>> Thanks again
>>>> HV
>>>>
>>>> On Saturday, July 7, 2012 5:13:07 PM UTC-7, Dianne Hackborn wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> No don't do that, the am command is not part of the SDK, and doing it
>>>>> this way is horrible inefficient (you need to spin up and initialize a
>>>>> fresh Dalvik vm for the am command, which takes a second or more), and
>>>>> usually totally broken because you are not launching the activity from 
>>>>> your
>>>>> own context for the system to correctly associate the call with you.
>>>>>
>>>>> And on top of that, your example here uses an explicit component name
>>>>> of the browser activity, which is *completely* an implementation detail: 
>>>>> it
>>>>> is likely to be different across different devices, it is *definitely*
>>>>> different on devices that ship with Chrome as the default browser, etc.
>>>>>
>>>>> This is totally wrong.
>>>>>
>>>>> The right thing to do is follow the SDK and do it the right way, the
>>>>> way it is documented.  If you need to write a little bit of JNI code (and
>>>>> it *is* a little bit, just a method call into your own Java method that
>>>>> uses the SDK), then that is what you do.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 11:58 PM, Sandeep Kumar <
>>>>> sandeepkumar....@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> try below:-
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ret = execl("/system/bin/sh", "sh", "-c", "am start -a 
>>>>>> android.intent.action.MAIN -n   
>>>>>> com.android.browser/.**BrowserAc**tivity", (char *)NULL);
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Saturday, July 7, 2012 3:51:58 AM UTC+9, HV wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  Wanted to know what is the best practice to launch apps from native
>>>>>>> code? Is using 'am' forbidden? It has to be via the system call though,
>>>>>>> like system("am start ..."); Will 'am' support be discontinued going
>>>>>>> forward?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  Is there any alternative method?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks much
>>>>>>> HV
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>  --
>>>>>> unsubscribe: 
>>>>>> android-porting+unsubscribe@**go**oglegroups.com<android-porting%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com>
>>>>>> website: 
>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/**group**/android-porting<http://groups.google.com/group/android-porting>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Dianne Hackborn
>>>>> Android framework engineer
>>>>> hack...@android.com
>>>>>
>>>>> Note: please don't send private questions to me, as I don't have time
>>>>> to provide private support, and so won't reply to such e-mails.  All such
>>>>> questions should be posted on public forums, where I and others can see 
>>>>> and
>>>>> answer them.
>>>>>
>>>>>   --
>>> unsubscribe: 
>>> android-porting+unsubscribe@**googlegroups.com<android-porting%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com>
>>> website: 
>>> http://groups.google.com/**group/android-porting<http://groups.google.com/group/android-porting>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Dianne Hackborn
>> Android framework engineer
>> hack...@android.com
>>
>> Note: please don't send private questions to me, as I don't have time to
>> provide private support, and so won't reply to such e-mails.  All such
>> questions should be posted on public forums, where I and others can see and
>> answer them.
>>
>>  --
> unsubscribe: android-porting+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> website: http://groups.google.com/group/android-porting
>



-- 
Dianne Hackborn
Android framework engineer
hack...@android.com

Note: please don't send private questions to me, as I don't have time to
provide private support, and so won't reply to such e-mails.  All such
questions should be posted on public forums, where I and others can see and
answer them.

-- 
unsubscribe: android-porting+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
website: http://groups.google.com/group/android-porting

Reply via email to