----- Original Message ----- From: "Matthias Bohlen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'Chad Brandon'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, February 21, 2004 6:19 PM Subject: [Andromda-devel] RE: Facades and decorators
> Hi Chad, > > see my comments below. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Chad Brandon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Saturday, February 21, 2004 8:18 PM > > To: Matthias Bohlen; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: Facades and decorators > > > > > > -- Another comment...you're going to remove the references to > > uml14 in the package names for the new metafacades right? So > > instead of org.andromda.metafacades.uml14.SomeFacadeImpl it > > would be org.andromda.metafacade.SomeFacadeImpl? > > No, the *Impls will be in the "*.uml14" package, the interfaces will be > in the "*.uml" package (not in the "*.common" package as I thought, > because there will be metamodels completely different from UML). True...better to put them in 'uml'. Some > time later, when we generate for UML 1.3, the *Impls will be in the > "*.uml13" package, the interfaces will still remain in the "*.uml" > package (at least, I hope we will be able to keep common interfaces for > UML 1.3 and 1.4!). > > > -- Also another thing, I don't know how you guys feel about > > this, but I think generated source code should ALWAYS go to > > the build directory (as opposed to the src directory)...I > > think it makes it easier to manage the cleanup of generated > > source (you just need to delete your build directory) as well > > as excluding the generated source from CVS, etc. I propose > > changing the location of generated source for the project to > > go to build/src...what do you guys think? > > Well, it's nice to have them in src/generated because this makes it > easier to add it as a source folder in an Eclipse project. Adding a > folder below "build" is unexpected in Eclipse. I use eclipse for everything and its actually no problem to add any folder you want to the source path...why is it unexpected? Almost every other project I've seen that generates source puts it in the build directory (or target if we use maven). You don't find it harder to manage your build scripts when you have generated source under the 'src' directory? I find it more confusing...... > > Cheers... > Matthias > > --- > > Matthias Bohlen > "Consulting that helps project teams to succeed..." > http://www.mbohlen.de/ > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. > Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with > a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now! > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click > _______________________________________________ > Andromda-devel mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/andromda-devel ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click _______________________________________________ Andromda-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/andromda-devel
