Is it wise to do so ?
Kunal
On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 06:53:39 -0400, Chad Brandon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
... snip ...
-- However I don't think we want to add the "VO" to the name or "vo" to the
package (in the existing Java cartridge). If we're gonna append something
that identifies it as a value object, I say we make it part of the ejb
cartridge and add a new ValueObject template. I use and (I'm sure others do
as well)...the value object for things other than isomorphic VOs, so my case
I would not want the "VO" appended or the "vo" added to the package but
actually want it generated as its modeled.
... snip ...
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training.
Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 - digital self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches, unmatched networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com
_______________________________________________
Andromda-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/andromda-devel
