[ http://jira.andromda.org/browse/EJB-25?page=comments#action_14663 ]
Leandro Hermida commented on EJB-25: ------------------------------------ Hello again, I guess I see why now - you are applying the foreignKeySuffix and constraintSuffix to the end of the tagged value. > EJB3: ManyToMany Association generates JoinTable with identical colum names > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: EJB-25 > URL: http://jira.andromda.org/browse/EJB-25 > Project: EJB Cartridge > Type: Bug > Environment: EJb3 Cartridge (latest from CVS), Androdma 3.2 Snapshot of May > 14th 2006. > Reporter: Torsten Lunze > Assignee: Vance Karimi > Priority: Minor > > When modelling an unidirectional ManyToMany association the EJB3 cartridge is > generating the following JointTable annotation for the property: > @javax.persistence.JoinTable ( > ... > joinColumns = [EMAIL PROTECTED](name = "ID")}, > inverseJoinColumns = [EMAIL PROTECTED](name = "ID")} > ) > The column names should be named different (easily just adding a 1 and 2 > respectivly to the EntityEmbeddable.vsl template) or let the name depend on a > tagged value or the association ends. > (see also http://galaxy.andromda.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=12852#12852) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.andromda.org/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
