On Thu, 10 Jan 2008, Richard Purdie wrote: > Whether it makes sense for angstrom stable, it isn't my place to say. I > can say that 2.6.17 is removed, I won't be touching it again and 2.6.23 > is the future though ;-).
Hi Richard, Not sure if this is relevant but collie still requires 2.6.21 for SD support (Thomas just needs time and resources to port the driver forward to 2.6.23 I think), so keeping 2.6.21 in stable I think would be good, but I agree - dropping all the older ones from dev might be a good way to keep focus on staying current. Or should dev continue to have 2.6.21 until collie-SD works on 23? -- Regards, Ashley J Gittins web: http://www.purple.dropbear.id.au jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Angstrom-distro-devel mailing list Angstrom-distro-devel@linuxtogo.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/angstrom-distro-devel