Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > If we want to extend the scope of BRSKI to cover BYOD on insecure
>> > WiFi, I
>> > think that's for some other WG.
mcr> I don't know if it's for another WG or not, but Owen's document deals
mcr> with this... I'm not sure I'd call it "BYOD", exactly... Bring a
mcr> not-yet-Owned Device, that you'd like to Own, and get pOwned. And
mcr> the WiFi is insecure, because the device doesn't (yet) have accesss
mcr> to the secure WiFi.
> Indeed. But I really don't see why ANIMA would handle this.
If you say that it's out of scope for bootstrapping-keyinfra, then I agree.
I think that it is in scope for ANIMA to specify a way to build and bootstrap
ACP tunnels over wifi, USB and BTLE (RFC7668). We want to do this because
it provides a way for devices in cabinet A of a datacenter to find their
partners in adjacent cabinet B. Yes, there might be a 100G fiber between
them... but it might be mis-installed, and/or the lambdas might be wrong,
etc.
--
] Never tell me the odds! | ipv6 mesh networks [
] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works | network architect [
] m...@sandelman.ca http://www.sandelman.ca/ | ruby on rails [
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Anima mailing list Anima@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
