Fries, Steffen <steffen.fr...@siemens.com> wrote:
>> Eliot Lear <l...@cisco.com> wrote:
>> > I think we had a lengthy conversation about BRSKI next steps, and that
we
>> > should expect to spend some time on this in ANIMA. I think I count at
least
>> > four drafts that are worth considering, and Michael might have more in
mind:
>>
>> > * Draft-vanderstock-anima-constrained-join-proxy
>> > * Draft-lear-eap-teap-brski
>> > * Draft-ietf-6tisch-{…}
>>
>> > * Draft-fries-anima-brski-async-enroll
>> {Eliot: Does this document include Oskar's requirements?}
>>
>> Additional documents that call on BRSKI:
>>
>> * draft-richardson-anima-smarkaklink (formerly
draft-richardson-anima-smartpledge)
-> I have revised slides, and I walk to talka bout them.
>> I believe that it solves draft-fries-anima-brski-async-enroll as well,
>> but I haven't read the entire document yet.
> I just read across draft-richardson-anima-smarkaklink and to my
> understanding it focuses on the voucher exchange in situations where
> the domain registrar is only temporary available. The voucher exchange
My focus on writing it is bootstrapping a registrar.
As such, the protocol flow does not include direct access to a registrar.
Oskar shared your requirements with me, and I think that we accomodate it in
the same protocol.
> different component than a local domain registrar. In that aspect it
> has a different scope than draft-richardson-anima-smarkaklink.
I think this discussion should be interesting!
--
] Never tell me the odds! | ipv6 mesh networks [
] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works | IoT architect [
] m...@sandelman.ca http://www.sandelman.ca/ | ruby on rails [
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Anima mailing list Anima@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
