Yes. It's important to make extensions but only after freezing the base RFCs.
Regards Brian Carpenter On 27-Jul-20 09:33, Michael Richardson wrote: > > Would BRSKI-AE want to do CoAPS instead of HTTPS? > Or in addition to HTTPS? > > I propose to leave base HTTPS BRSKI as-is, and then do whatever renames you > like by merging BRSKI-AE into constrained-voucher, and all all of the > asynchronous efforts over CoAP. > > This has the interesting possibilities of supporting BRSKI-AE CoAP over BTLE, > NFC, and SMS. (not necessarily with an IP layer) > > -- > Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Sandelman Software Works > -= IPv6 IoT consulting =- > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Anima mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima > _______________________________________________ Anima mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
