Esko Dijk <[email protected]> wrote: > Note: There are some issues in the current payload definition in BRSKI voucher status and enrollment status, I've created > https://github.com/anima-wg/anima-bootstrap/issues/144 > for these.
I think that the "1" -> 1, can be fixed in AUTH48. https://github.com/anima-wg/anima-bootstrap/commit/0830f26eee796624f40e0a0387933e608ebee063 You also complain about successful should not have reasons. That seems like a bigger change, and am not sure it matters. I thought that we have CDDL for both telemetry. > Is any help needed to author these updates? (Or does this need to be > taken up in the errata once we publish as RFC...? I remember that > people want to rather have it published than polished.) -- Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Sandelman Software Works -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Anima mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
