Yes, why not.

For the moment, in the invisible version 1, two content-formats are
transported:

1) application cbor describing the header of the JPY message
2) application cbor, a cbor byte string containing the DTLS

This clearly sits between two approaches.
1) replace with application/cbor for the whole
or 2) remove the cbor byte string from the DTLS payload

BTW, as these messages are not accompanied by a coap header , it is may
be better to completely forget about content formats.

Additional suggestions are really welcome.

Peter
Carsten Bormann schreef op 2020-11-30 14:12:

On 2020-11-30, at 14:01, Esko Dijk <[email protected]> wrote:
without using core-multipart

Why not?

Grüße, Carsten
_______________________________________________
Anima mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima

Reply via email to