Thanks Alissa. Paul's reviews have been extremely thorough and helpful, and we will try to resolve all his comments in the next version.
Yes, I agree that more experience is needed. The core GRASP documents are all in the hands of the RFC Editor now, so we are in good shape for that to happen. Regards Brian On 04-Dec-20 02:52, Alissa Cooper via Datatracker wrote: > Alissa Cooper has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-anima-grasp-api-08: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this > introductory paragraph, however.) > > > Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-anima-grasp-api/ > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > There are a few outstanding unresolved comments from the Gen-ART review that > it would be useful to resolve, particularly clarifications in Section 2.3.5. > > In general the Gen-ART review made me wonder if it might be useful to get some > more implementation experience and interop testing going before trying to > extend or build out much more functionality on top of GRASP, since there are > many implementation-specific decisions left unspecified. > > > > _______________________________________________ Anima mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
