Obviously, having reported my own error, I think it should be verified ASAP. Does anyone disagree?
Regards Brian Carpenter On 26-May-21 12:02, RFC Errata System wrote: > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8992, > "Autonomic IPv6 Edge Prefix Management in Large-Scale Networks". > > -------------------------------------- > You may review the report below and at: > https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6591 > > -------------------------------------- > Type: Technical > Reported by: Brian Carpenter <[email protected]> > > Section: 6 > > Original Text > ------------- > objective = ["PrefixManager.Params", objective-flags, any] > > Corrected Text > -------------- > objective = ["PrefixManager.Params", objective-flags, loop-count, any] > > Notes > ----- > Careless omission in original > > Instructions: > ------------- > This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please > use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or > rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party > can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. > > -------------------------------------- > RFC8992 (draft-ietf-anima-prefix-management-07) > -------------------------------------- > Title : Autonomic IPv6 Edge Prefix Management in Large-Scale > Networks > Publication Date : May 2021 > Author(s) : S. Jiang, Ed., Z. Du, B. Carpenter, Q. Sun > Category : INFORMATIONAL > Source : Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and Approach > Area : Operations and Management > Stream : IETF > Verifying Party : IESG > _______________________________________________ Anima mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
