Hi Toerless, Support for some specific Autonomic Service Agents looks like a good area to explore after all the fundamental RFCs has been published.
I am going to submit a draft on this. If time allows, I would like to take 10-15 minutes. You might want to consider this early request when asking for session slots for IETF 111. Thank you, Yizhou -----Original Message----- From: Anima [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of [email protected] Sent: Friday, June 4, 2021 10:45 PM To: [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: [Anima] Input/Questions for ANIMA @ IETF 111, online Hi folks, Deadline for submission of WG meeting requests for IETF 111 is June 11th. In the last few IETFs, we only collected our agenda items last minute, and the 1 hour sessions where then pretty tightly packed, allowing for little discussion. However, we do have ongoing good discussion in the weekly brski related design team meetings, and other side activities. Yada yada: I will wait for the deadline and want to ask via this mail for feedback if people feel we should request a longer (or two) slots @IETF111, especially when contributors think they want to discuss longer about potential new work. Short of any feeedback for such longer slot suggestions, i will go forward and ask again for a 1 hour slot before the deadline and then we can do our usual last-minute *sigh* agenda building against that - as usual *sigh*. Lets also remember that side-meetings are easy to set up and do (NEW!) also support meetecho. Aka: are for all intent and purpose tools-wise as good as a full online IETF (i think). Cheers Toerless _______________________________________________ Anima mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima _______________________________________________ Anima mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
