Carsten Bormann <[email protected]> wrote:
    >> One possibility is that kramdown-rfc ought to look for, and include
    >> the latest foo-YYYY-MM-DD.yang file, when told to ::include foo.yang.
    >> Alternatively, it could perhaps do the YYYY-MM-DD substitution itself.

    cb> How about

    cb> {::include foo-????-??-??.yang}

    cb> and, if there is no such file, kramdown-rfc expands the wild card in
    cb> the directory and uses the numerically latest file?

You'd use shell globs?
I think it might be better to use PCRE.
It might be better to have this as "winclude"

    cb> (There might also be a use-case for actually including all these
    cb> files, so I’m still in thinking mode, but I think this is close.)

    >> for when not working with kramdown.

    cb> What? :-)

Yes, it causes me confusion too.
Basically, I'm trying to contribute YANG modules (as pull-requests) to drafts
for which I'm not an author, and I don't really want to have to convince them 
to upgrade.

-- 
]               Never tell me the odds!                 | ipv6 mesh networks [ 
]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works        | network architect  [ 
]     [email protected]  http://www.sandelman.ca/        |   ruby on rails    [ 
        



Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Anima mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima

Reply via email to