Kent Watsen <[email protected]> wrote: > An IANA registry cannot be used to extend RFC 8366 now…if that were > desired, it would have had to be defined by RFC 8366. A revision of > RFC 8366 could define such behavior, but then would might wonder why > not use the revision to instead flip "leaf assertion” to “type > identityref”.
Yes, okay, so if we have to revise 8366, then this sounds like something we
should do.
> FWIW, "leaf assertion” is not used by SZTP (RFC 8572).
--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Anima mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
