Brian E Carpenter <[email protected]> wrote: >> Are there common parts that would argue for three documents >> (B--referencing-->A, and C--referencing-->A)
> That was my question too. Splitting the document but having
> Part 1 normatively reference Part 2 would be unfortunate.
>> "A" could also be RFC8366bis.
> Then we'd have 3 documents as an AUTH48 cluster, right? But
> if the result is a more logical set of documents for future
> readers, it's the right thing to do.
It's only an issue if the references are circular.
We do get clusters with the relationship is a DAG, but they aren't as much of
a problem, and just represent the RPC being overworked, I think.
--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Anima mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
