Dan Harkins <[email protected]> wrote: > Why can't the RA signal to the CA whatever things it things should > be included in the CA, in addition to the goo provided in the client's
I don't know. Why can't it? What protocol can it use that is well deployed?
> Why don't you want to define _that_ signalling instead of overloading
> a different protocol?
I'd love to define that protocol.
But, we thought CSRattrs was that protocol.
--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Anima mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
