On 2021-07-04 6:13 p.m., Michael Richardson wrote:
Hi, I have converted RFC8366.xml to Markdown, and switched to the latest MT
makefile, and after a bit of small massage to remove "8366" from the page,
and point to RFCs which are published, the result is at:
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=rfc8366&url2=draft-richardson-anima-rfc8366bis.txt
...
I propose that the WG adopt this as the -00, and then we change the document
to change this into an RFC7224-style IANA-maintained YANG module.
I have heard verbally from Toerless that he'd like to have the document
include more "changes" before the WG adopts it.
I don't know what might involve. I also think that this is wrong
according to RFC7221.
If the WG has agreed that it needs to do RFC8366bis, then lets do that.
_______________________________________________
Anima mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
