Brian E Carpenter <[email protected]> wrote: > Where's the "Changes from RFC8366" section? We need that, for sure. > What differences are there, anyway? I don't see anything significant > in the diffs. So why would we want to adopt it?
There are no changes yet a) because the WG hasn't adopted it. b) the WG hasn't reached consensus on the changes. If I proposed an individual ID with changes in it, then that would be just my opinion. That's I think that we should adopt a WG -00 that is near word-for-word identical copy compared to RFC8366. -- Michael Richardson <[email protected]> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting ) Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Anima mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
