Yes that could certainly be useful! I feel we should ask it after (most of) the current review comments are addressed: currently some parts are confusing to a reader, and some content is still missing in Sections 8 and 9.
Best regards Esko -----Original Message----- From: Brian E Carpenter <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, October 11, 2021 21:38 To: Esko Dijk <[email protected]>; Anima WG <[email protected]>; [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Anima] WGLC for draft-ietf-anima-constrained-join-proxy-04, ends October 14th 2021 Esko, > Also, the document has had little review from the WG so far I could see. True. Maybe we should also ask for an early review by the Security Area? This is a rather specialised topic, and I'm not sure this WG has many people with the skills needed for an independent review. Regards Brian Carpenter _______________________________________________ Anima mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
