Fries, Steffen <[email protected]> wrote: > - UC1 is proposed to stay as "BRSKI-AE" covering the application of > alternative enrollment protocols as this was the initially described > use case . It will cover the description of utilizing other enrollment > protocol than EST in general and using Lightweight CMP specifically.
> - UC2 is proposed to become "BRSKI with Pledge in Responder Mode
> (BRSKI-PRM)", as it addresses the communication between the pledge and
> the registrar by reversing the initiator and responder role (compared
> to RFC 8995) also introducing the registrar-agent as facilitator for
> the communication.
As discussed at the design team meeting, this works for me.
BRSKI-PRM => pronounced Brewski-Prime.
see: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Optimus_Prime
--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Anima mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
