The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8995, "Bootstrapping Remote Secure Key Infrastructure (BRSKI)".
-------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6736 -------------------------------------- Type: Editorial Reported by: Michael Richardson <[email protected]> Section: 5.5 Original Text ------------- MASA implementations SHOULD anticipate future media ntypes but, of course, will simply fail the request if those types are not yet known. Corrected Text -------------- MASA implementations SHOULD anticipate future media types but, of course, will simply fail the request if those types are not yet known. Notes ----- "ntypes" is not a word Instructions: ------------- This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC8995 (draft-ietf-anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra-45) -------------------------------------- Title : Bootstrapping Remote Secure Key Infrastructure (BRSKI) Publication Date : May 2021 Author(s) : M. Pritikin, M. Richardson, T. Eckert, M. Behringer, K. Watsen Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and Approach Area : Operations and Management Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG _______________________________________________ Anima mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
