Dear ANIMA WG
To move the discussion from IETF112 meeting to the mailing list:
a) To be able for other drafts to extend the RFC8366 voucher YANG data model,
we need
to fix up the RFC8366 voucher model. This is the smallest possible RFC8366bis
scope.
b) We can make the scope bigger by also adding not only the hooks to make it
extensible,
but actually integrating extensions from other WG drafts.
I have no strong opinion either way. I would be happy with option a), as long
as we
know we are not missing out on any othrer extension point than the one we did
already
identify!
Cheers
Toerless
_______________________________________________
Anima mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
