Esko Dijk <[email protected]> wrote: > Based on my earlier review comments: see below Section 9 proposed text. > It adds these elements that I think are missing in the current -05 > text. I hope that clarifies it. Also it refers to an existing IANA > policy from RFC 8126.
At first, I was all... "how did we miss this". But, back in section 5.3, JPY_Message was defined as an *array* not a map, so there are no indexes to manage in an IANA registry. (Or rather, the indexes are implicit, maybe) Maybe we can text making this more explicit? -- Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Sandelman Software Works -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Anima mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
