Thanks; the rt names in this PR need to be aligned with the rt names in the remainder of this document. Currently, the new names as I proposed are being used. So let's await the outcome of the names choice for this PR.
Esko -----Original Message----- From: Michael Richardson <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2021 19:16 To: Esko Dijk <[email protected]>; [email protected]; Peter van der Stok <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [Anima] I-D Action: draft-ietf-anima-constrained-join-proxy-05.txt / Section 9.1 proposed text Esko Dijk <[email protected]> wrote: > Also based on my review and some ambiguities I noticed in the current > -05 section 9.1, here is a new text proposal for 9.1 (now renumbered to > 9.2 based on my previous mail which introduces section 9.1): now as: https://github.com/anima-wg/constrained-join-proxy/pull/8 -- Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Sandelman Software Works -= IPv6 IoT consulting =- _______________________________________________ Anima mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
