Apart from the discussion whether the (current) hierarchical naming convention 
is to be used, or any names without hierarchy (because it is allowed for rt), 
there is an additional consideration to make.

If a Pledge wants to use CoAP discovery to discover one of a Constrained Join 
Proxy or Registrar on the link, because typically it would be able to contact 
both (DTLS connection & messages are identical), it would help very much if it 
only has to do a single discovery action for both. And not 2 separate discovery 
actions.

If the Pledge discovers for resources with rt=brski* , this is useful as it 
will find resource "rt=brski" indicating a Registrar and also resources 
"rt=brski.jp" indicating a Constrained Join Proxy. I can pick either one it 
finds. If both are found it may prefer the Registrar directly (rt=brski). 

In my view this naming choice (brski.*) thus makes things more efficient and 
consistent; it is more than just a name.

Regards
Esko

-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Richardson <[email protected]> 
Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2021 18:49
To: Esko Dijk <[email protected]>; [email protected]
Cc: Sheng Jiang <[email protected]>; [email protected]; Peter van der Stok 
<[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Anima] checking on advancing 
draft-ietf-anima-constrained-join-proxy / 'rt' naming


Esko Dijk <[email protected]> wrote:
    > I checked the new version against my review comments; and the following
    > comment is still open – this is where Peter and me disagree.

understood.
I have no real opinion.

    > core.* - CoRE WG types
    > ace.* - ACE WG types
    > brski.* - ANIMA WG types for BRSKI – not yet in the registry but 
specified in
    > draft-constrained-voucher.
    > oic.* - any types specified by OCF/OIC
    > fa.*  - any types specified by Fairhair Alliance

    > Hence my request to comply to this convention, however undocumented it
    > is today. Any system architect would agree to that seeing the current
    > list.

Can we ask core@ to review and comment then?

original message: 
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/anima/s9yU6LPnV8pE17Ws2xjH2f0mrO0/


--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-



_______________________________________________
Anima mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima

Reply via email to