* While reviewing latest updates; one other issue came up: the draft (re
    * latest in Github) currently mentions DNS-SD as a means for a Pledge to
    * discover a Join Proxy.

please note that this discovery occurs on the untrusted ("DULL") side.

Brian E Carpenter <[email protected]> wrote:
> I think there's another reason for deferring it. We have a pending proposal
> in draft-eckert-anima-grasp-dnssd for how DNS-SD will integrate in an
> autonomic environment. It seems wise to have more clarity about that before
> defining how DNS-SD works for a Join Proxy. The two things may be
> completely orthogonal, but that requires a little thought.

I don't think we can assume any GRASP or DNS-SD interoperation on the
untrusted side.  It's just a bad idea.

As for the Join Proxy discovering the Registrar, that's a different question.
We defined GRASP already for that.  If we have a DNS-SD method as well, then
that would just be an additional method inside an ACP.

--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-



Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Anima mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima

Reply via email to