<[email protected]> wrote: > (1)(major) However, I think that ietf-voucher module should be reworked > to make use of the structure defined in RFC 8791.
I've attempted to do this. My change is at: https://github.com/anima-wg/voucher/pull/17/files#diff-746c78189eaffb33aa44d9bc0af92dc952a7cb0fd06d19f7142c9dfaa66dc464 This is part of a pull request which I have not yet applied. What I've done is to remove the grouping, and the container, because I think that sx:structure does that for me. I wonder how RFC8995, which extends the grouping will cope with this change. I imagine that it has to use sx:augment-structure. I will test this yang modules with our draft-ietf-anima-constrained-voucher to understand if it results in changes to the SID generation or not. I would like your opinion as to whether this change is small enough to fit into going to Internet Standard for RFC8366. -- Michael Richardson <[email protected]> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting ) Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Anima mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
