Brian E Carpenter <[email protected]> wrote: > This lacks either an Obsoletes: or Updates: RFC8366 in the header, a > corresponding statement in the Abstract, and an explanation in the text > of how it relates to RFC8366.
Yes, you are absolutely right. I believe that this document could go to Internet Standard. Do those documents Obsolete what they replace? I wonder if the WG is onboard with going to IS. -- Michael Richardson <[email protected]> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting ) Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Anima mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
